How We Ensure Quality
wiki.code employs a multi-layered quality assurance system combining automated checks, peer review, and community monitoring.
Quality Overview
Our quality assurance system ensures that every documentation page on wiki.code is technically accurate, up-to-date, and follows best practices. We combine automated validation with human oversight through these core mechanisms:
- Peer Review: All documentation changes require approval from at least two reviewers.
- Automated Testing: Code snippets are automatically tested in our execution playground.
- Community Moderation: Anyone can flag content for review and report outdated information.
- Version History: Every change is archived and visible for audit and reverting.
Quality Process Breakdown
Automated Quality Checks
Before documentation changes are published, our system automatically tests for code execution, broken links, and markdown formatting standards.
Peer Review
Every documentation page must pass technical review by at least two contributors with expertise in the domain.
Community Monitoring
Our users can flag outdated information, submit corrections, and leave quality ratings helping prioritize review.
Quality Metrics
15,328
Audited Pages
8,942
Contributors
42,328
Revisions Reviewed
Participate in Quality Assurance
Everyone can contribute to maintaining the quality of wiki.code. Try these actions to help:
- Submit documentation corrections using our editor
- Review changes in the pending documentation queue
- Report outdated content through the issue tracking system