Governance Models
Understanding how we balance innovation, security, and community needs across our platforms.
1. Foundation Governance
We follow a meritocratic model led by an independent technical steering committee with equal voting rights. Contributors are recognized based on technical impact and community engagement.
2. Community Governance
Open governance via public work groups and proposal systems. Developers and users can submit RFCs and vote on roadmap priorities to shape our technical direction.
3. Enterprise Governance
Custom SLAs and governance frameworks for enterprise clients, balancing regulatory needs with decentralized decision-making through our hybrid oversight system.
Why Governance Matters
Governance ensures our technologies evolve responsibly while maintaining technical integrity and community trust. Through balanced decision-making and transparency, we avoid centralized control while preventing fragmentation.
Proposal System
Every technical decision goes through a 30-day public RFC review cycle with community voting and expert analysis. Final decisions are documented in our governance registry.
Contributor Rights
Active contributors earn voting rights based on their patch history and code quality metrics. Our meritocracy ensures expertise drives technical decisions.